This article was, quite simply, very
strange. Very strange.
The whole manner and process in which
David and Michelle, even the original author, discussed "eggs" left me feeling very
uncomfortable. For the purposes of full
disclosure, I was a bit thrown off—okay, very thrown off—by the very mechanical
and businesslike style in which they handled their potential child.
This is supposed to be the
spontaneous and beautiful miracle of life! Full of surprises and unimagined
complexity. How could they even hope for perfection?
I remember how pregnancy and such things
seemed to me as a child. When I was
in the 4th grade (ish?) I picked up a Newsweek magazine, and, wanting to feel smart and mature for my age, flipped
to a random article and forced myself to read the whole thing.
This article was on infertility and its effects on couples. Yippee!
The article never directly mentioned sex or how the whole pregnancy thing worked, but, from this, I was able to make the following conclusions:
This article was on infertility and its effects on couples. Yippee!
The article never directly mentioned sex or how the whole pregnancy thing worked, but, from this, I was able to make the following conclusions:
· Most women eventually
end up pregnant.
· If you want a child,
you must be married and just wish really hard until it finally
happens.
· Even when married
though, some women face the possibility of not becoming pregnant.
· The older you get,
the fewer chances you have of becoming pregnant.
· Women have eggs.
(Whatever that means.)
· The stork theory is
pure rubbish.
But from Grade A, it seems as though the whole "perfect child"
theory is also rubbish, an insincere and pretentious attempt at confirming the supposition
of an ideal reality, manifested in the impossible expectations and hopes for an
inconceivable (pun intended) child.
In fact, the whole vagueness of
the piece reflects how alien the whole process seemed to me, and no doubt
overwhelming to the author as well. David's refusal to reveal anything about
himself and his situation left me feeling very confused and with a bad
impression of this "disturbing" man (I'm sorry, but he sounds like an
asshole). It also left me thinking: what are the motives for David and
Michelle? The very businesslike and ambiguous manner made it seem as though
they weren't doing this because they had no other method of conception—to actually
have a child—but instead to create an inhumane set of selective genes. A sort of trophy, one
on an endless list of accomplishments to parade around town for others to envy.
No comments:
Post a Comment