After reading the gist of Jonathan Edwards'
piece, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, I can't help but feel a
little bit of disgust at what he is saying because I've been so influenced and
so surrounded by my many peers who are atheist or agnostic or at least,
non-Christian. I guess it's really been a part of today's youth, liberal,
atheist culture, to look down on with disgust and contempt and ridicule on what
we see as stupid, uneducated, devout, Bible-thumping, hill-billy, conservative
Christians who we view as having these arrogant and self-righteous beliefs
about who's going to hell and who isn't, and I just can't help but feel a
little disgust at that. It's because of so many cultural and media influences,
and even though I'm not really sure what I believe, I still have doubts about
what I've been fed by my own peers.
In class, we talked about the Edwards' and his Puritan thoughts, with the whole consensus being one of mockery of the idea of a fiery Hell and "Hey, his ideas are crazy extreme!" Well, I wanted to shout out as well, "Well, maybe you're crazy! Maybe because you all are living in this present moment that you think that! Maybe it's singly the influences of today's culture that make you think that, since you're all so young, you haven't had the chance to explore the ideas and thoughts of other cultures and times! Who knows what you'd think if you were all born a century in the future! Maybe we are all only perpetuating the beliefs of today, not of ourselves!"
But then again, I'm not that kind of person.
I guess what I mean to say is that I maintain doubt on both sides of the religious and the non-religious, the atheist and the agnostic, the pantheist and the pagan, or whatever. It's all really kind of confusing.
In class, we talked about the Edwards' and his Puritan thoughts, with the whole consensus being one of mockery of the idea of a fiery Hell and "Hey, his ideas are crazy extreme!" Well, I wanted to shout out as well, "Well, maybe you're crazy! Maybe because you all are living in this present moment that you think that! Maybe it's singly the influences of today's culture that make you think that, since you're all so young, you haven't had the chance to explore the ideas and thoughts of other cultures and times! Who knows what you'd think if you were all born a century in the future! Maybe we are all only perpetuating the beliefs of today, not of ourselves!"
But then again, I'm not that kind of person.
I guess what I mean to say is that I maintain doubt on both sides of the religious and the non-religious, the atheist and the agnostic, the pantheist and the pagan, or whatever. It's all really kind of confusing.
I
mean, look at the Westboro Baptist Church. We view them as crazy, condemning,
"you're-going-to-hell" people, and maybe that's what they are, crazy,
condemning, "you're-going-to-hell" people. But go back to colonial
times and they're just the Brady Bunch of the 1700s.
So I
guess what my point is that belief is based on perspective of time period. With
like the ancient Aztecs or Mayans who never heard of Christianity, so are they
going to hell? So, this brings into doubt so many other things about my own
belief system; shouldn't truth be an everlasting thing that is not subject to
time? So, what is the truth? Is there any truth at all? Have we missed it?
Is it coming?
So
what I really guess my point is that...well—stuff is confusing. And I regret
having written myself into this hole of confusion.